![]() |
| nature-based solutions and greenwashing |
Quick guides for citizens: “follow the trees”
- Before planting: Is tenure resolved? Is the species list adapted to site conditions? Are there 12- and 36-month survival milestones in the contract? (Primavera manual; UNDP corruption-risk mapping). (Primavera et al., 2012; UNDP, 2010/2015).
- During planting: Are the seedlings healthy and locally sourced? Are nurse plots established? Is community labor paid fairly? (Forest Foundation PH training) (Forest Foundation PH, 2017).
- After planting: Are survival audits publicly accessible? Do they use independent sampling and remote sensing tools? Are replacements documented? (Implement the best practices across CBMR and open-data standards). (Primavera et al., 2012; FAO).
- For carbon projects: Is the baseline explained and peer-reviewed? Are the benefits outlined in the contract for the communities? What is the grievance mechanism? (West et al., 2024; CIFOR-ICRAF, 2023).
Putting integrity into “nature-based solutions”
The label “nature-based solutions” (NbS) has become a fast lane for funding—but without integrity guardrails, it can also become a fast lane for greenwashing. The last two years have seen a wave of analyses and investigations revealing over-credited offsets and illicit actors laundering reputations through forest carbon projects (The Guardian, 2024; Reuters, 2025). Policy takeaway: Do not rely solely on logos or registry listings; instead, prioritize methods, data, and rights— encompassing baseline transparency, independent verification, and community consent (The Guardian, 2024; Reuters, 2025; Carbon Market Watch, 2023).
Summary: from green mirage to green protection
Mangrove belts that survive lower storm surge and save lives; forests that cool watersheds and slow floods; plantations that actually become forests—these are possible. The pattern across the Philippines, India, and Bangladesh is clear:
- Design incentives for survival and stewardship, not planting headlines.
- Resolve land rights and publish benefit shares to unlock community care.
- Verify with data (audits + satellites) and publish it in usable formats.
- Back enforcement across timber and mining chains—because watershed integrity is non-negotiable for downstream cities.
- Treat carbon finance as a tool, not a fig leaf—insist on credible baselines and community rights.
UNDP’s early warnings and TI’s recent land-governance analyses remain the best one-page test: if people lack rights and information, don’t expect trees to grow (UNDP, 2010/2015; TI, 2023).

Comments
Post a Comment