Adapt or Perish in Climate Change: Historical Responsibility and the Global North-South Divide

 Historical Responsibility and the Global North-South Divide

Global North-South Divide

One of the most contentious aspects of climate justice is the historical responsibility of developed nations, primarily in the Global North, for driving climate change through industrialization. Historical responsibility is a legacy that divides the Global North and South, with the latter disproportionately bearing the negative consequences of climate change despite contributing the least emissions they contribute to global warming. This subtopic studies the origins of this division, the ethical debates surrounding historical responsibility, and the mechanisms proposed to address these injustices.

The Legacy of Industrialization and Historical Emissions

The Industrial Revolution, which started in the late 18th century, was a turning point in history, enabling unprecedented economic progress and technological advancement. The crucial part of the revolution was the birth of large-scale exploitation of fossil fuels, which led to the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Developed nations, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, were the first to industrialize and are thus responsible for most historical carbon emissions.

According to the Carbon Brief (2019), 23 rich nations have been responsible for half of all historical CO₂ emissions since 1850.

According to reports, the United States accounts for nearly 25% of the total, while the European Union contributes approximately 22% of these climate change-causing gas emissions. It is a consensus that these emissions enabled these now-developed nations to achieve massive economic growth and technological advancement, but at a substantial environmental and social cost now being felt globally.

In contrast, many developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, industrialized later or have yet to industrialize fully. Their cumulative emissions are relatively low, but they are the most vulnerable to climate change impacts due to geographic, economic, and infrastructural factors.

The Global North-South Divide

The climate responsibility and vulnerability divide between the Global North and Global South starkly intensifies the vast disparities between nations. Bangladesh, Haiti, Ethiopia, and other countries in the Global South account for less than 4% of global emissions yet face hurricanes, droughts, floods, and other climate-related disasters. This imbalance is evident across several dimensions:

Economically, developed nations positioned themselves to invest in climate adaptation and mitigation strategies as they historically grow their economies and develop infrastructure relying on fossil fuels. In contrast, many developing nations lack the necessary financial resources to appropriately respond to the devastating impacts of climate change, making them more vulnerable to environmental disasters.

Regarding technology, the Global North has more access to advanced renewable energy solutions and disaster management tools. However, the transfer of advanced technology to the Global South is very limited, thus worsening the divide and leaving developing countries ill-equipped to combat climate challenges.

Furthermore, institutional capacity is crucial in combating climate change. Developed nations are reaping benefits from their well-established institutions created to manage climate change risks. Conversely, most developing countries have institutions that need support with governance issues, corruption, and inadequate capacity to implement effective climate policies, further aggravating their vulnerability to climate change.

Ethical Arguments for Historical Responsibility

The ethical foundation of historical responsibility in addressing climate change is primarily rooted in the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities" (CBDR-RC), as established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

The CBDR-RC principle acknowledges that all countries are responsible for combating climate change. However, it highlights the idea that developed countries should take the lead because of their historical emissions and stronger capacity to implement solutions.

Central to the discussion of climate justice is the Polluter Pays Principle.

The principle argues that those who have caused environmental harm should be responsible for the costs associated with mitigating and adapting to climate impacts. This principle inarguably holds developed nations accountable for their massive contribution to the problem.

Additionally, wealthier countries have a moral obligation to support vulnerable developing countries that lack the resources crucial to responding to the effects of climate change. The support can be in various forms, such as financial aid, technology transfer, and capacity-building efforts.

Finally, the concept of intergenerational justice underscores that historical emissions have more profound negative impacts that last for centuries, as carbon dioxide and other gases remain in the atmosphere for an extended period. This concept entails that developed nations are responsible for current and future generations facing the consequences of past actions.

Mechanisms to Address the Divide

A number of mechanisms were established to address the Global North-South divide and promote climate justice. The Paris Agreement (2015) outlined climate finance as one key aspect, and it committed developed countries to mobilizing $100 billion annually to support climate action in developing countries. The financial support is intended to fund renewable energy projects, climate-resilient infrastructure, and adaptation strategies. However, the goal of the promise still needs to be met as the annual amount is insufficient given the scale of the impacts of climate change.

The second relevant mechanism is loss and damage funding, which aims to respond to the irreversible impacts of climate change in developing and small island states, such as the loss of livelihoods, properties, and ecosystems. At COP27 in 2022, nations reached an agreement to establish a fund to compensate for the losses and damages of vulnerable nations and rectify historical injustices due to gas emissions.

Additionally, technology transfer plays a vital role in supporting developing countries in transitioning from fossil fuels to low-carbon renewable energy resources. UNFCCC's Technology Mechanism is one initiative that aims to facilitate technology transfer.

Lastly, debt relief is vital for most developing nations burdened by unsustainable debt, which hinders their capacity to invest in climate solutions. Debt-for-climate swaps are one solution that involves forgiving debt in return for commitments to sustainability initiatives. They present a potential pathway to alleviate the financial strain and boost climate action in developing countries.

Challenges in Bridging the Divide

Various challenges persist in bridging the Global-North-South divide despite the mechanisms established. A notable issue is insufficient funding, as climate finance commitments frequently fall short of expectations. Most funds being allocated are loans rather than grants, thereby increasing the debt burden on developing nations. For example, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) allocated approximately $10.3 billion for various climate projects, with a mix of loans and grants; however, the exact figures for loans versus grants can vary by project and over time. For instance, recent reports have shown that a substantial portion of this funding comprises loans, which can increase the financial burden on recipient countries (Green Climate Fund, 2023).

The second challenge relates to accountability and transparency. Ensuring that climate finance is effectively used and reaching the communities that need it most is more complex due to a lack of oversight, which can lead to the misuse of funds intended for climate projects.

Another challenge is political resistance from developed nations, which often hinders progress, especially when recognizing their accountability for historical emissions. This creates fears of potential legal or financial consequences.

Read the ebook on the Google Play Store

Adapt or Perish in Climate Change: Carbon Emissions and Social Inequality

 Carbon Emissions and Social Inequality

Carbon emissions caused climate change and social inequality

Carbon emissions and their impacts are not equally distributed across the globe; neither are the social burdens they create borne equally by all humans. Social inequality plays a central role in defining who has the adaptation resources and who suffers the worst consequences of climate change.

It makes sense when we say that carbon emissions and social inequality are deeply intertwined, as vulnerable communities contribute the least to global gas emissions but suffer the harsh consequences.

In this section, we will explore how carbon emissions aggravate social inequality, the concept of climate justice, and the need for equitable solutions to climate change's impacts.

Disproportionate Contributions to Carbon Emissions

Wealthier nations and individuals contribute disproportionately to carbon emissions due to their consumption patterns and industrial activities.

High-income countries, representing only 16% of the global population, are responsible for over 75% of historical carbon emissions (Oxfam, 2020). Within these nations, most wealthy people tend to have larger carbon footprints due to energy-intensive lifestyles, such as frequent air travel, private vehicle ownership, and luxury houses with plenty of carbon-emitting facilities.

Conversely, if not all, but most developing and low-income nations and communities contribute pretty much less to global emissions. Their economies are often less industrialized with non-energy-intensive industries, and their populations rely on subsistence farming and low energy consumption. Nevertheless, these communities are the first to experience the devastating impacts of climate change, such as droughts, (flash) floods, and rising sea levels. This imbalance shows a fundamental injustice in the global response to the overall GHG emissions.

The Vulnerability of Marginalized Communities

Climate change has disproportionately affected marginalized communities globally, with studies indicating that these populations are 3 to 4 times more likely to be adversely impacted by climate-related disasters compared to their wealthier counterparts (Zhou et al., 2020). For instance, in the United States, low-income communities of color are 1.5 times more likely to live in areas with high pollution levels, making them more vulnerable to health issues exacerbated by climate change (Gonzalez et al., 2019).

Furthermore, according to the United Nations, an estimated 700 million people may be displaced by climate change by 2050, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups who lack the resources to adapt or relocate (United Nations, 2018).

Most rural farmers in developing countries and regions face declining agricultural productivity due to shifting rainfall patterns and prolonged droughts, threatening their food security and livelihoods. Small island states, such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, are at risk of becoming uninhabitable due to rising sea levels, with limited options for relocation or adaptation. Even in wealthier nations, low-income communities are more likely to live in areas prone to flooding or pollution, such as near industrial facilities or poorly constructed housing.

Additionally, women, Indigenous Peoples, cultural minorities, and such marginalized groups face compounded vulnerabilities. More often than not, women in developing countries bear the burden of bringing home water and food and securing energy for their families. However, the consequences of environmental degradation make their daily chore more difficult than ever.

Climate Justice and Equity

Climate justice exemplifies the need for equitable solutions to resolve the unequal burdens of climate change. The framework recognizes that those severely affected contribute the least carbon emissions and that fixing these disparities requires systemic change.

One critical aspect of climate justice is ensuring that developing nations receive adequate financial and technological support to adapt to climate impacts. The Paris Agreement includes provisions from developed countries to provide $100 billion annually in climate finance to assist vulnerable nations, but this target still needs to be met (UNFCCC, 2021).

These financial resources serve as major support for many countries in building resilient and green infrastructure, transitioning to renewables and clean energy, and protecting their ecosystems and populations from climate risks.

Another crucial component of climate justice is ensuring marginalized groups' voices are incorporated into decision-making processes in soliciting and creating climate solutions. One best examples would be accessing the Indigenous People's know-how and understanding of how the natural world works. As they live in communion with nature, they can provide suggestions and realistic solutions. Thus, they can offer valuable insights into sustainable forest, land management, and biodiversity conservation. Therefore, ensuring a seat for these communities at the table could be a more effective and inclusive climate solution.

Inequities in Carbon Mitigation Efforts

If efforts to reduce carbon emissions are not implemented equitably, they could sometimes aggravate inequality despite their necessity.

For example, carbon taxes or energy transitions are sometimes very challenging due to specific policies that can disproportionately affect low-income households by raising energy costs or causing job losses in carbon-intensive industries.

A concrete instance is that introducing carbon pricing in some regions has raised fuel prices, sparking massive protests from working-class people who depend on cheaper energy for transportation and heating facilities.

In the same manner, an abrupt imposition of a transition to renewable energy can displace numerous workers employed in fossil fuel industries, costing them economic hardship as dependents on these sectors.

Recent studies indicate significant inequities in carbon mitigation efforts, particularly affecting low-income and marginalized communities. For instance, a study by McJeon et al. (2022) found that carbon pricing mechanisms can disproportionately impact low-income households, with estimates showing that such policies could raise energy costs by as much as 15% for these households compared to their wealthier counterparts.

To address the issues these policies raise, relevant institutions and policymakers must design mitigation strategies that prioritize equity before implementing renewable energy effort plans. Effective strategies should include using revenues from carbon taxes to support social welfare programs, retraining workers for green jobs and livelihood opportunities, and providing targeted support to vulnerable communities.

The Global North-South Divide

The world is aware of the chasm that divides the Global North (developed nations) and the Global South (developing nations), a significant element in the relationship between carbon emissions and inequality.

Industrialized nations have historically reaped the economic benefits of fossil fuels while ignoring their environmental costs. Their economic benefits and technological capabilities make them adaptive to the impacts of climate change, while most developing nations experience the impacts and struggle to develop using fossil fuels. This disparity has led to collaborative calls to reform and repair the damages, such as debt relief and loss-and-damage funding, to support developing nations in addressing the consequences of carbon emissions.

One of the main initiatives to address this global issue, as agreed by countries during the 2022 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP27) in Paris, is the establishment of loss and damage funds to compensate vulnerable nations for their climate-related losses. The agreement (Paris Agreement) represents progress in global efforts, but implementing such initiatives remains contentious and complicated.

The Loss and Damage Fund (LDF) was recently established, and their initial and crucial board meetings commenced. "Loss and damage" refers to the adverse consequences of climate change, impacting human lives, infrastructure, property, and ecosystems, encompassing economic and non-economic losses. Financial support will be provided through grants and concessional financing, with the World Bank overseeing fund coordination to assist recovery from natural disasters. The establishment of the Fund marks the initial phase in addressing climate-induced disaster consequences, with UNDP experts involved in determining its management structure and providing support for areas like climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction.

Following the Fund's announcement, developed countries pledged over $420 million in voluntary contributions, totaling $661 million. More commitments are expected from individual countries, the private sector, and philanthropic organizations. The Fund aims to address financing gaps for immediate humanitarian assistance and long-term recovery needs in affected countries (UNDP, 2024).

Building a Fairer Future

A comprehensive approach that prioritizes justice and equity is crucial in addressing the inequities associated with carbon emissions.

Investing in vulnerable communities by allocating resources to develop climate-resilient infrastructure and ensuring access to clean energy, healthcare, and education in marginalized areas are the key elements in fulfilling this approach.

It is also essential to empower local voices by involving affected communities in designing and implementing climate policies, which can leverage their unique insights and priorities. Promoting fair transitions is also crucial, particularly for workers in carbon-intensive industries. This can be achieved through retraining programs, job creation in the renewable energy sector, and establishing social safety nets.

Lastly, enhancing international cooperation is vital, with a focus on strengthening commitments to climate finance and technology transfer to support developing nations in their efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change. By tackling these inequities, we can work toward a more just and sustainable future, ensuring that the burdens and benefits of climate action are equitably shared.