Historical Responsibility and the Global North-South Divide
 |
| Global North-South Divide |
One of the most contentious aspects of climate justice is the historical responsibility of developed nations, primarily in the Global North, for driving climate change through industrialization. Historical responsibility is a legacy that divides the Global North and South, with the latter disproportionately bearing the negative consequences of climate change despite contributing the least emissions they contribute to global warming. This subtopic studies the origins of this division, the ethical debates surrounding historical responsibility, and the mechanisms proposed to address these injustices.
The Legacy of Industrialization and Historical Emissions
The Industrial Revolution, which started in the late 18th century, was a turning point in history, enabling unprecedented economic progress and technological advancement. The crucial part of the revolution was the birth of large-scale exploitation of fossil fuels, which led to the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Developed nations, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, were the first to industrialize and are thus responsible for most historical carbon emissions.
According to the Carbon Brief (2019), 23 rich nations have been responsible for half of all historical CO₂ emissions since 1850.
According to reports, the United States accounts for nearly 25% of the total, while the European Union contributes approximately 22% of these climate change-causing gas emissions. It is a consensus that these emissions enabled these now-developed nations to achieve massive economic growth and technological advancement, but at a substantial environmental and social cost now being felt globally.
In contrast, many developing countries, particularly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, industrialized later or have yet to industrialize fully. Their cumulative emissions are relatively low, but they are the most vulnerable to climate change impacts due to geographic, economic, and infrastructural factors.
The Global North-South Divide
The climate responsibility and vulnerability divide between the Global North and Global South starkly intensifies the vast disparities between nations. Bangladesh, Haiti, Ethiopia, and other countries in the Global South account for less than 4% of global emissions yet face hurricanes, droughts, floods, and other climate-related disasters. This imbalance is evident across several dimensions:
Economically, developed nations positioned themselves to invest in climate adaptation and mitigation strategies as they historically grow their economies and develop infrastructure relying on fossil fuels. In contrast, many developing nations lack the necessary financial resources to appropriately respond to the devastating impacts of climate change, making them more vulnerable to environmental disasters.
Regarding technology, the Global North has more access to advanced renewable energy solutions and disaster management tools. However, the transfer of advanced technology to the Global South is very limited, thus worsening the divide and leaving developing countries ill-equipped to combat climate challenges.
Furthermore, institutional capacity is crucial in combating climate change. Developed nations are reaping benefits from their well-established institutions created to manage climate change risks. Conversely, most developing countries have institutions that need support with governance issues, corruption, and inadequate capacity to implement effective climate policies, further aggravating their vulnerability to climate change.
Ethical Arguments for Historical Responsibility
The ethical foundation of historical responsibility in addressing climate change is primarily rooted in the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities" (CBDR-RC), as established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
The CBDR-RC principle acknowledges that all countries are responsible for combating climate change. However, it highlights the idea that developed countries should take the lead because of their historical emissions and stronger capacity to implement solutions.
Central to the discussion of climate justice is the Polluter Pays Principle.
The principle argues that those who have caused environmental harm should be responsible for the costs associated with mitigating and adapting to climate impacts. This principle inarguably holds developed nations accountable for their massive contribution to the problem.
Additionally, wealthier countries have a moral obligation to support vulnerable developing countries that lack the resources crucial to responding to the effects of climate change. The support can be in various forms, such as financial aid, technology transfer, and capacity-building efforts.
Finally, the concept of intergenerational justice underscores that historical emissions have more profound negative impacts that last for centuries, as carbon dioxide and other gases remain in the atmosphere for an extended period. This concept entails that developed nations are responsible for current and future generations facing the consequences of past actions.
Mechanisms to Address the Divide
A number of mechanisms were established to address the Global North-South divide and promote climate justice. The Paris Agreement (2015) outlined climate finance as one key aspect, and it committed developed countries to mobilizing $100 billion annually to support climate action in developing countries. The financial support is intended to fund renewable energy projects, climate-resilient infrastructure, and adaptation strategies. However, the goal of the promise still needs to be met as the annual amount is insufficient given the scale of the impacts of climate change.
The second relevant mechanism is loss and damage funding, which aims to respond to the irreversible impacts of climate change in developing and small island states, such as the loss of livelihoods, properties, and ecosystems. At COP27 in 2022, nations reached an agreement to establish a fund to compensate for the losses and damages of vulnerable nations and rectify historical injustices due to gas emissions.
Additionally, technology transfer plays a vital role in supporting developing countries in transitioning from fossil fuels to low-carbon renewable energy resources. UNFCCC's Technology Mechanism is one initiative that aims to facilitate technology transfer.
Lastly, debt relief is vital for most developing nations burdened by unsustainable debt, which hinders their capacity to invest in climate solutions. Debt-for-climate swaps are one solution that involves forgiving debt in return for commitments to sustainability initiatives. They present a potential pathway to alleviate the financial strain and boost climate action in developing countries.
Challenges in Bridging the Divide
Various challenges persist in bridging the Global-North-South divide despite the mechanisms established. A notable issue is insufficient funding, as climate finance commitments frequently fall short of expectations. Most funds being allocated are loans rather than grants, thereby increasing the debt burden on developing nations. For example, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) allocated approximately $10.3 billion for various climate projects, with a mix of loans and grants; however, the exact figures for loans versus grants can vary by project and over time. For instance, recent reports have shown that a substantial portion of this funding comprises loans, which can increase the financial burden on recipient countries (Green Climate Fund, 2023).
The second challenge relates to accountability and transparency. Ensuring that climate finance is effectively used and reaching the communities that need it most is more complex due to a lack of oversight, which can lead to the misuse of funds intended for climate projects.
Another challenge is political resistance from developed nations, which often hinders progress, especially when recognizing their accountability for historical emissions. This creates fears of potential legal or financial consequences.
Read the ebook on the Google Play Store
